My view, when allegations of the sort faced by Neil Gaiman are made, is firstly that these are serious matters and must be taken seriously (investigated properly, and appropriate action taken), and then secondly that the position of “innocent until proven guilty” is not only legally vital but also socially important.
The problem in this case is that the nature of the alleged offences, coupled with where they are alleged to have taken place, makes any such investigation nigh-impossible – “this happened, in an isolated location with nobody else present, and sufficiently long ago that any evidence that once existed is long since gone.”
The upshot of that is that while the allegations must still be taken seriously, they can’t meaningfully be dealt with. That’s not justice, whichever way it falls – if Gaiman did indeed do what was alleged, there’s an appropriate punishment but no way to apply it; if he did not then he has no means of clearing his name.
As for myself, my feeling is that I won’t now be buying any further books he publishes (where previously I certainly would have done so) and won’t be watching any new shows based on his works. I will watch the end of “Good Omens”, as we’re already well into the story at this point, but have removed (or will remove) “American Gods” from my watchlist, and won’t be adding anything else. I don’t like that that’s the position, but that feels about as close to ‘right’ as I can manage.
No comments:
Post a Comment