The end of the most recent season of “Doctor Who” left things in a fairly bad place, and coupled with the uncertainty over the Disney deal, there’s a real chance the show will be going on another long hiatus. Even if not, there will definitely be a delay of a couple of years, as they will need to come up with a new cast (or at least part of one), new writers and scripts, and actually make the thing.
But there’s also the debate of how best to go forward with
it.
My thinking is that the best way forward depends on whether
there’s a short or a long pause before the show returns. But it boils down to three
options:
Option One: A short pause, but otherwise everything
continues
The best-case scenario, at least for the BBC, is that either
Disney continue with their distribution deal or they find a new streaming
partner straight away, RTD continues as showrunner, and they proceed into the
new season more or less right away.
In that case, I’d recommend picking up where they left off:
Gatwa’s Fifteen has regenerated into Piper’s Sixteen, and the fallout from that
becomes the centre of the Christmas special in 2026 or 2027. This is then a
one-off adventure culminating into another regeneration (as Billie Piper is almost
certainly too expensive, and too in-demand, to be the Doctor long-term), before
going into the next season.
Not ideal, but it gets them out of the current mess without
too much turmoil.
Option Two: A short-ish pause, resuming without a streaming
partner
Alternately, the BBC may find themselves without a streaming
partner, in which case the show will inevitably face a somewhat longer hiatus
and then may return but with a smaller budget. In which case the chances of
having Billie Piper return even for a special are slim, and there’s a pretty
good chance that they’d want to replace the rest of the team.
In that case, I think I’d advocate for, essentially, a “double
regeneration” – the show picks up again from just before the end of the
previous season, we see Gatwa regenerate, see Piper appear and say “oh, hello”…
and then the regeneration continues straight through into whoever is cast as
the “real” Sixteen. The explanation, if one is ever felt needed, is basically
the same as for Romana’s regeneration back in the day – the Doctor was “trying
on” a new face but it didn’t stick.
And then you go from there.
Option Three: A longer pause
In the event that Doctor Who finds itself without a
streaming partner, the BBC may take the view that they want to rest it, to let some
time pass under the bridge, let a new generation of writers come to it, and
then revive the series – it was highly successful once, so why not again?
In which case, I’d recommend simply picking up with a new
Doctor on new adventures, and simply not referencing what went before. At some
point, way in the future, they may want to pull another “Day of the Doctor”,
and thus fill in the gaps, but unless and until they come up with something
really solid, just leave it unanswered. (And, crucially, don’t rush into answering
the question, or even hinting at the fact that there is a question to be answered
– let any revival get really confident on its feet first before touching it.)
(I was at this point going to talk about a fourth option,
which would be a full-blown reboot of the series. But the more I think about
it, the more I think that’s a terrible idea. Don’t do that!)
#18: “Tower of Fools”, by Andrzej Sapkowski
No comments:
Post a Comment